Others, like JavaRX , are wholesale asynchronous alternatives. Loom is a newer project in the Java/JVM ecosystem that attempts to address limitations in the traditional concurrency model. In particular, Loom offers a lighter alternative to threads along with new language constructs for managing them.

It will be fascinating to watch as Project Loom moves into the main branch and evolves in response to real-world use. As this plays out, and the advantages inherent in the new system are adopted into the infrastructure that developers rely on , we could see a sea change in the Java ecosystem. Beyond this very simple example is a wide range of considerations for scheduling. These mechanisms are not set in stone yet, and the Loom proposal gives a good overview of the ideas involved. Fibers are designed to allow for something like the synchronous-appearing code flow of JavaScript’s async/await, while hiding away much of the performance-wringing middleware in the JVM. Revised implementation of concurrency frameworks , reflection, StackWalker, etc.

Filesystem calls

A thread is a sequence of computer instructions executed sequentially. While a thread waits, it should vacate the CPU core, and allow another to run. Fibers will be mostly implemented in Java in the JDK libraries, but may require some support in the JVM. Microsoft Azure supports your workload with abundant choices, whether you’re working on a Java app, app server, or framework.

The goal is to allow most Java code to run inside fibers unmodified, or with minimal modifications. It is not a requirement of this project to allow native code called from Java code to run in fibers, although this may be possible in some circumstances. It is also not the goal of this project to ensure that every piece of code would enjoy performance benefits when run in fibers; in fact, some code that is less appropriate for lightweight threads may suffer in performance when run in fibers. A prototype of the core feature, then called fibers, is now called virtual treads in the first 18 months, but as usual, most of the work of getting to the production quality release was not in the core features itself but in the things adjacent to it. It took several literators to get the performance we wanted, and they rewrote much of the work in the implementation of Java’s old IO subsystems to illuminate blocking and get the debugger experience just tight.

Making a Loom

Dealing with sophisticated interleaving of threads is always going to be a complex challenge, and we’ll have to wait to see exactly what library support and design patterns emerge to deal with these situations. At a high level, a continuation is a representation in code of the execution flow. In other words, a continuation allows the developer to manipulate the execution flow by calling functions.

In some cases, you must also ensure thread synchronization when executing a parallel task distributed over multiple threads. The implementation becomes even more fragile and puts a lot more responsibility on the developer to ensure there are no issues like thread leaks and cancellation delays. However, note that Virtual Threads are still a preview feature so there may be breaking changes to it. So, you might not want to migrate to virtual threads yet and wait until virtual threads go out of preview as switching back might be pretty difficult.

Some of these improvements have already shipped as part of separate features. From a user perspective looms as there are almost no new APIs. The new runtime constrictor is the virtual thread that java project loom shares today’s thread’s APIs and semantics. We still implement them differently from the existing platform threads rather than tying to OS threads and carrying around a large contagious stack.

QCon International Software Development Conference

This new lightweight concurrency model supports high throughput and aims to make it easier for Java coders to write, debug, and maintain concurrent Java applications. Indeed, some languages and language runtimes successfully provide a lightweight thread implementation, most famous are Erlang and Go, and the feature is both very useful and popular. One of Java’s most important contributions when it was first released, over twenty years ago, was the easy access to threads and synchronization primitives. Java threads provided a relatively simple abstraction for writing concurrent applications.

• For example, data store drivers can be more easily transitioned to the new model.
• However, note that Virtual Threads are still a preview feature so there may be breaking changes to it.
• Project Loom is certainly a game-changing feature from Java so far.
• However, that might be fine temporarily if you are in the process of migrating an existing Reactive project to synchronous code using virtual threads and you are planning to remove the reactive framework from your project .
• The good news for early adopters and Java enthusiasts is that Java virtual threads libraries are already included in the latest early access builds of JDK 19.

Performance — Treats shared data as immutable so as to allow sharing by a large number of threads, and to enable runtime optimizations. JEP Preview Features are fully specified and fully implemented Language or VM Features of the Java SE Platform; and yet impermanent. They are made available in JDK Feature Releases to allow for developer feedback based on real-world uses, before them becoming permanent in a future release. This also affords tool vendors the opportunity to work towards supporting features before they are finalized into the Java SE Standard. Oracle is proud to announce the general availability of JDK 20. This release is the 11th Feature Release delivered on time through the six-month release cadence.

Virtual Threads

When a continuation suspends, no try/finally blocks enclosing the yield point are triggered (i.e., code running in a continuation cannot detect that it is in the process of suspending). It is not the goal of this project to add an automatic tail-call optimization to the JVM. Cost is only un-mounting the call-stack from platform thread and storing in heap and vice versa.

There is good reason to believe that many of these cases can be left unchanged, i.e. kernel-thread-blocking. For example, class loading occurs frequently only during startup and only very infrequently afterwards, and, as explained above, the fiber scheduler can easily schedule around such blocking. Many uses of synchronized only protect memory access and block for extremely short durations — so short that the issue can be ignored altogether. Similarly, for the use of Object.wait, which isn’t common in modern code, anyway , which uses j.u.c. A separate Fiber class might allow us more flexibility to deviate from Thread, but would also present some challenges.

We can achieve the same functionality with structured concurrency using the code below. We want updateInventory() and updateOrder() subtasks to be executed concurrently. Ideally, the handleOrder() method should fail if any subtask fails. However, if a failure occurs in one subtask, things get messy. Like any ambitious new project, Loom is not without its challenges.

For instance, an application would easily allow up to millions of tasks execution concurrently, which is not near the number of threads handled by the operating system. Before proceeding, it is very important to understand the difference between parallelism and concurrency. Concurrency is the process of scheduling multiple largely independent tasks on a smaller or limited number of resources. Whereas parallelism is the process of performing a task faster by using more resources such as multiple processing units.

What does this mean to Java library developers?

Before looking more closely at Loom’s solution, it should be mentioned that a variety of approaches have been proposed for concurrency handling. In general, these amount to asynchronous programming models. Some, like CompletableFutures and Non-Blocking IO, work around the edges of things by improving the efficiency of thread usage.

Inspired by this content? Write for InfoQ.

It proposes that developers could be allowed to use virtual threads using traditional blocking I/O. If a virtual thread is blocked due to a delay by an I/O task, it still won’t block the thread as the virtual threads can be managed by the application instead of the operating system. This could easily eliminate scalability issues due to blocking I/O. Another relatively major design decision concerns thread locals. Currently, thread-local data is represented by the ThreadLocal class. Another is to reduce contention in concurrent data structures with striping.

Splitting the implementation the other way — scheduling by the OS and continuations by the runtime — seems to have no benefit at all, as it combines the worst of both worlds. Many people assumed we would embrace the asynchronous programming style offered by so-called “reactive” frameworks. Reactive may be the best people can do with the current JVM, but our goal is to do better, which we can do by making threads lighter and more scalable, letting developers keep using the model and tooling they’ve been using successfully for years. Briefly, instead of creating threads for each concurrent task , a dedicated thread looks through all the tasks that are assigned to threads in a non-reactive model, and processes each of them on the same CPU core.

b. Internal user-mode continuation

The capitalized words Thread and Fiber would refer to particular Java classes, and will be used mostly when discussing the design of the API rather than of the implementation. The word thread will refer to the abstraction only and never to a particular implementation, so thread may refer either to any implementation of the abstraction, whether done by the OS or by the runtime. JEP 405 and JEP 427 fall under the auspices of Project Amber, a project designed to explore and incubate smaller Java language features to improve productivity. When you want to make an HTTP call or rather send any sort of data to another server, you will open up a Socket.

As the issue of limiting memory access for threads is the subject of other OpenJDK projects, and as this issue applies to any implementation of the thread abstraction, be it heavyweight or lightweight, this project will probably intersect with others. Developers use Java threads, which Java then converts to operating system threads for each supported operating system. Even from the first release of Java, the platform has allowed for written concurrent code using a straightforward model. When first introduced, Java threads allow for a platform-independent way to write concurrent code.